|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]高伟中,谭思哲,田 超,等.西湖凹陷中央反转构造带圈闭油气充满度差异性原因分析*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):20-28.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.003]
 GAO Weizhong,TAN Sizhe,TIAN Chao,et al.Analysis on the oil and gas fullness difference of the Central Inversion Tectonic belt of Xihu sag in East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):20-28.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.003]
点击复制

西湖凹陷中央反转构造带圈闭油气充满度差异性原因分析*()

《中国海上油气》[ISSN:1673-1506/CN:11-5339/TE]

卷:
第31卷
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
20-28
栏目:
东海盆地油气勘探开发成果专辑
出版日期:
2019-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on the oil and gas fullness difference of the Central Inversion Tectonic belt of Xihu sag in East China Sea basin
文章编号:
1673-1506(2019)03-0020-09
作者:
高伟中谭思哲田 超高顺莉孙 鹏
中海石油(中国)有限公司上海分公司 上海 200335
Author(s):
GAO WeizhongTAN SizheTIAN ChaoGAO ShunliSUN Peng
CNOOC China Limited, Shanghai Branch, Shanghai 200335, China
关键词:
西湖凹陷 中央反转构造带 圈闭油气充满度 差异性 断裂活动强度
Keywords:
Xihu sag Central Inversion Tectonic belt oil and gas fullness of the trap difference fault activity intensity
分类号:
TE122.3
DOI:
10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对西湖凹陷中央反转构造带生、储、盖、圈、运、保等石油地质条件进行了分析,结果表明西湖凹陷中央反转构造带中北部5个背斜油气藏油气充满度存在差异,变化范围是20%~100%,纵向上花港组H5砂组以上层位充满度总体较高、以下层位充满度降低。5个构造位于同一含油气系统内,烃源为下部的平湖组,储层为花港组,区域盖层为花港组上段H1—H2层,以背斜圈闭为主,总体上具备相似的静态地质要素,是有利的含油气目标区。5个油气藏主要为两期成藏,分别为15~13 Ma和6~5 Ma,以第一期为主,圈闭均形成于玉泉组沉积期末,圈闭形成期、断裂活动期和油气充注期在时空上耦合关系良好。断裂活动强度不同导致油气运移的输导能力不同,造就了中央反转构造带油气藏富集程度的差异,油源断层活动强度大,则油气运移条件好,圈闭油气充满度高。
Abstract:
Analysis was conducted on the petroleum geological conditions(i.e., generation-accumulation-caprock-trap-migration and preservation)of the Central Inversion Tectonic belt of Xihu sag, and the results show the different oil and gas fullness of five anticline reservoirs in the middle-northern parts of this tectonic belt(ranging from 20% to 100%). Longitudinally, the fullness of strata above H5 sand group in the Huagang Formation is generally higher, and that of the strata below this sand group is lower. The five structures are located in the same petroleum system, where the hydrocarbon source is the underlying Pinghu Formation, the storage is the Huagang Formation, and the regional caprock is the H1—H2 layers in the Upper Member of the Huagang Formation. Dominated by the anticline trap, they are the favorable hydrocarbon-bearing target zones, which generally exhibits similar static geological elements. These five oil and gas reservoirs were mainly developed in two stages, namely the 15~13 Ma and 6~5 Ma respectively, and the first stage plays the dominant role. All traps were formed at the end of the Yuquan Formation sedimentary period, and good time-spatial coupling relationship was maintained during trap formation, fault activity period and hydrocarbon charging periods. The different intensities of fault activities lead to the different conductivities of oil and gas migration, which results in the different enrichments of reservoirs in the Central Inversion Tectonic belt. If the fault activity of oil source is intensive, the oil and gas migration conditions will be good, and the oil and gas fullness of trap is high as well.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张建培,余逸凡,张田,等. 东海西湖凹陷深盆气勘探前景探讨[J].中国海上油气,2013,25(2):24-29.
ZHANG Jianpei,YU Yifang,ZHANG Tian,et al.A discussion on the exploration potential of deep basin gas in Xihu sag,East China Sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2013,25(2):24-29.
[2] 田海芹.西湖凹陷含油气系统研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2000,24(1):38-43.
TIAN Haiqin.Research on the oil-bearing series of Xihu depression[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,China(Edition of Natural Science),2000,24(1):38-43.
[3] 贾健谊,顾惠荣.东海西湖凹陷含油气系统与油气资源评价[M].北京:地质出版社,2002.
[4] 叶加仁,顾慧荣,贾健谊.东海西湖凹陷油气地质条件及其勘探潜力[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(4):221-126.
YE Jiaren,GU Huirong,JIA Jianyi.Petroleum geological condition and exploration potential of Xihu depression,East China Sea[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2008,28(4):221-126.
[5] 熊斌辉,张喜林,张锦伟,等.西湖凹陷油气成藏的主控因素[J].海洋石油,2008,28(2):14-24.
XIONG Binhui,ZHANG Xilin,ZHANG Jinwei,et al.The key factor controlling hydrocarbon accumulation in Xihu depression[J].Offshore Oil,2008,28(2):14-24.
[6] 单超,叶加仁,曹强,等.西湖凹陷孔雀亭气田成藏主控因素[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2015,35(1):135-144.
SHAN Chao,YE Jiaren,CAO Qiang,et al.Controlling factors for gas accumulation in Kongqueting gas field of Xihu sag[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2015,35(1):135-144.
[7] 李宁,覃军,江瀚,等.西湖凹陷T气田油气分布特征与主控因素[J].断块油气田,2017,24(3):329-332.
LI Ning,QIN Jun,JIANG Han,et al.Hydrocarbon distribution features and its main controlling factors of T gas field,Xihu sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J].Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field,2017,24(3):329-332.
[8] 蔡华,张建培,唐贤君.西湖凹陷断裂系统特征及其控藏机制[J].天然气工业,2014,34(10):18-26.
CAI Hua,ZHANG Jianpei,TANG Xianjun.Characteristics of the fault systems and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation in the Xihu sag,East China Sea Shelf Basin[J].Natural Gas Industry,2014,34(10):18-26.
[9] 龚再升.中国近海含油气盆地新构造运动和油气成藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):133-138.
GONG Zaisheng.Neotectonic movement and hydrocarbon accumulation in petroliferous basins,offshore China[J].Oil & Gas Geology,2004,25(2):133-138.
[10] 苏奥,陈红汉,王存武,等.东海盆地西湖凹陷油气成因及成熟度判别[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(5):521-527.
SU Ao,CHEN Honghan,WANG Cunwu,et al.Genesis and maturity identification of oil and gas in the Xihu sag,East China Sea Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(5):521-527.
[11] 张敏强,钟志洪,夏斌,等.东海西湖凹陷中南部晚中新世构造反转与油气运聚[J].中国海上油气,2005,17(2):73-79.
ZHANG Minqiang,ZHONG Zhihong,XIA Bin,et al.Late Miocene tectonic inversion and hydrocarbon migration and accumulation in central and southern Xihu sag,East China Sea[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2005,17(2):73-79.
[12] 陈琳琳,王文强.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷深层烃源岩探讨[J].海洋石油,1999,19(2):1-7.
CHEN Linlin,WANG Wenqiang.Discussion on the source rock of deep strata in Xihu trough,the East China Sea[J].Offshore Oil,1999,19(2):1-7.
[13] 胡明毅,柯岭,梁建设.西湖凹陷花港组沉积相特征及相模式[J].石油天然气学报,2010,32(5):1-5.
HU Mingyi,KE Ling,LIANG Jianshe.The characteristics and pattern of sedimentary facies of Huagang Formation in Xihu depression[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2010,32(5):1-5.
[14] 武法东,周平.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷第三系层序地层与沉积体系分析[M].北京:地质出版社,2000.
[15] 孙思敏,彭仕宓.东海西湖凹陷平湖油气田花港组高分辨率层序地层特征[J].石油天然气学报,2006,28(4):184-187,448-449.
SUN Simin,PENG Shimi.High resolution sequence stratigraphic characters in Huagang Formation of Pinghu oil and gas field in Xihu depression[J].Journal of Oil and Gas Technology,2006,28(4):184-187,448-449.
[16] 张建培,徐发,钟韬,等.东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组—花港组层序地层模式及沉积演化[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,2012,32(1):35-40.
ZHANG Jianpei,XU Fa,ZHONG Tao,et al.Sequence stratigraphic models and sedimentary evolution of Pinghu and Huagang Formations in Xihu trough[J].Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology,2012,32(1):35-40.
[17] 蔡全升,胡明毅.西湖凹陷黄岩构造带花港组砂岩储层成岩作用研究[J].科学技术与工程,2013,30(2):9012-9017.
CAI Quansheng,HU Mingyi.Diagenesis of sandstone of Huagang Formation in Huangyan tectonic belt,Xihu sag[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2013,30(2):9012-9017.
[18] 高伟中,孙鹏,赵洪,等.西湖凹陷花港组深部储层特征及控制因素[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2016,43(4):396-404.
GAO Weizhong,SUN Peng,ZHAO Hong,et al.Study of deep reservoirs characters and main control factors of Huagang Formation in Xihu sag,East China Sea[J].Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition),2016,43(4):396-404.
[19] 王存武,赵志刚,张功成,等.东海西湖凹陷盖层条件及对油气藏的控制作用[J].海洋石油,2013,33(2):22-27.
WANG Cunwu,ZHAO Zhigang,ZHANG Gongcheng,et al.Cap rocks and influence on hydrocarbon accumulations in Xihu sag of East China Sea[J].Offshore Oil,2013,33(2):22-27.
[20] 罗群,姜振学,庞雄奇.断裂控藏机理与模式[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007:1-17.
[21] 姜振学,庞雄奇,曾溅辉,等.油气优势运移通道的类型及其物理模拟实验研究[J].地学前缘,2005,12(4):507-516.
JIANG Zhenxue,PANG Xiongqi,ZENG Jianhui,et al.Research on types of the dominant migration pathways and their physical simulation experiments[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2005,12(4):507-516.
[22] 蒋有录,刘景东,李晓燕,等.根据构造脊和地球化学指标研究油气运移路径:以东濮凹陷濮卫地区为例[J].地球科学—中国地质大学学报,2011,36(3):521-529.
JIANG Youlu,LIU Jingdong,LI Xiaoyan,et al.Actual hydrocarbon migration paths based on ridge-like structures analysis and geochemical indicator[J].Earth Sciences—Journal of China University of Geosciences,2011,36(3):521-529.
[23] 李克成,蒋有录,万涛,等.济阳坳陷埕东地区断层输导与油气运移特征[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(5):685-692.
LI Kecheng,JIANG Youlu,WANG Tao,et al.Characteristics of fault translocation and hydrocarbon migration in Chengdong area,Jiyang depression[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(5):685-692.

相似文献/References:

[1]周心怀,蒋一鸣,唐贤君.西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):1.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.001]
 ZHOU Xinhuai,JIANG Yiming,TANG Xianjun.Tectonic setting, prototype basin evolution and exploration enlightenment of Xihu sag in East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):1.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.001]
[2]侯国伟,李 帅,秦兰芝,等.西湖凹陷西部斜坡带平湖组源-汇体系特征*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):29.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.004]
 HOU Guowei,LI Shuai,QIN Lanzhi,et al.Source-to-Sink system of Pinghu Formation in west slope belt of Xihu sag,East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):29.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.004]
[3]张 武,侯国伟,肖晓光,等.西湖凹陷低渗储层成因及优质储层主控因素*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):40.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.005]
 ZHANG Wu,HOU Guowei,XIAO Xiaoguang,et al.Genesis of low permeability reservoirs and main controlling factors of high quality reservoirs in Xihu sag,East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):40.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.005]
[4]程 熊,侯读杰,赵 喆,等.西湖凹陷天然气成因及来源分析*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):50.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.006]
 CHENG Xiong,HOU Dujie,ZHAO Zhe,et al.Analysis on the genesis and source of natural gas in Xihu sag, East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):50.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.006]
[5]陈 波,段冬平,刘英辉,等.西湖凹陷中深层河流相砂体地震沉积学解释与沉积演化分析*[J].中国海上油气,2019,31(03):117.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.014]
 CHEN Bo,DUAN Dongping,LIU Yinghui,et al.Seismic sedimentary interpretation and sedimentary evolution analysis on middle-deep fluvial facies sandbodies in Xihu sag,East China Sea basin[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2019,31(03):117.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2019.03.014]
[6]周心怀.西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J].中国海上油气,2020,32(01):1.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2020.01.001]
 ZHOU Xinhuai.Geological understanding and innovation in Xihu sag and breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2020,32(03):1.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2020.01.001]
[7]沈伟锋 于仲坤 刁 慧 张 涛.西湖凹陷热流演化史模拟及成藏意义[J].中国海上油气,2020,32(01):42.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2020.01.005]
 SHEN Weifeng YU Zhongkun DIAO Hui ZHANG Tao.Simulation of heat flow evolution history in Xihu sag and its significance for hydrocarbon accumulation[J].China Offshore Oil and Gas,2020,32(03):42.[doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2020.01.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*“十三五”国家科技重大专项“东海深层低渗-致密天然气勘探开发技术(编号:2016ZX05027)”、中海石油(中国)有限公司科技联合攻关项目“宁波27-1构造再评价关键问题攻关(编号:2018OT-KT-KY-LH-01)”部分研究成果。
第一作者简介: 高伟中,男,高级工程师,1991年毕业于原江汉石油学院石油地质勘查专业,获学士学位,长期从事海上油气勘探综合研究工作。地址:上海市长宁区通协路388 号中海油大厦(邮编:200335)。E-mail:gaowzh@cnooc.com.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-05-20